Yesterday the NY Times published this comment that I made concerning Robert Kennedy Jr being barred from Instagram:
Your comment has been approved!
Thank you for sharing your thoughts with The New York Times community.
Jennifer | Vancouver Canada
What I find interesting about the posts by Robert Kennedy Jr is that they are not solely his opinions at all. They include opinions of international scientists and medical professionals as well. Why is there a reticence to hear all facets? Why is there only one agenda being promulgated by the media and the tech companies when it is becoming evident that there is a trickling rise in the number of deaths and illnesses related to the vaccines that are being promoted? Notwithstanding the fact that lockdowns are causing a rise of a whole new set of medical conditions in the area of mental health. Wouldn't all of us win if we could be presented with alternative viewpoints? This is the nature of democracy.
As soon as the comment was published, there were predictable comments given, vitriolic comments about Mr. Kennedy and his constant vigilance about the vaccine and covid overall. Two hours after my comment was published, about 35 people agreed with it, a good counter balance to the negative comments provided.
And then two hours after that the NY Times took my comment down. I asked them, politely, if this was a technical glitch but they declined to get back to me.
Never be deceived by mainstream media like the Times. They are trying to control the agenda in a propaganda machine that is skewed to vested interests only.
Look to alternative sources, because "truth" is a rare commodity today.
Your comment has been approved!
Thank you for sharing your thoughts with The New York Times community.
Jennifer | Vancouver Canada
What I find interesting about the posts by Robert Kennedy Jr is that they are not solely his opinions at all. They include opinions of international scientists and medical professionals as well. Why is there a reticence to hear all facets? Why is there only one agenda being promulgated by the media and the tech companies when it is becoming evident that there is a trickling rise in the number of deaths and illnesses related to the vaccines that are being promoted? Notwithstanding the fact that lockdowns are causing a rise of a whole new set of medical conditions in the area of mental health. Wouldn't all of us win if we could be presented with alternative viewpoints? This is the nature of democracy.
As soon as the comment was published, there were predictable comments given, vitriolic comments about Mr. Kennedy and his constant vigilance about the vaccine and covid overall. Two hours after my comment was published, about 35 people agreed with it, a good counter balance to the negative comments provided.
And then two hours after that the NY Times took my comment down. I asked them, politely, if this was a technical glitch but they declined to get back to me.
Never be deceived by mainstream media like the Times. They are trying to control the agenda in a propaganda machine that is skewed to vested interests only.
Look to alternative sources, because "truth" is a rare commodity today.